Message Boards

Of course Wolverine because his claws very sharp and he have regeneration and rapid reflex. He just destroy spiderman.

Who will win this a lot depends on what we call a win. A knockout is definatly a win can spidey incapacitate wolvy probably not with even his strength level physically, yes he could potentially drown him but that is against spideys morals. Is webbing him up a win well probably as the webbing lasts 2 hours and ifwebbed up totally he is stopped longer than a knockout on wolvy. Can wolvy beat spiderman well physically definatly both with claws or punches/kicks ect. 

The question is can wolvy hit spidey enough to do the damage and would he use claws for a kill attack, also can spidey web him up? Both are up for debate it is opinion and if in a fight in a comic would be writer opinion but I doubt with such big names that either would be allowed to win without plot devices. 

I have read as well (not sure if is on here or somewhere else it is late and has been a hard week lol) about wolvys healing going out of control. When wolvy was around years ago he healed from a gunshot in about 1 hour now is near instant. The probablem is nearly everyone with any physical powers has super healing now most a wolvies old level. So people talk about his upgrade as a bad thing but not everyone else's upgrade. Spiderman for an example back in 60s and 70s didn't heal quick. I remember him with an injured arm having it strapped up in a sling for a few issues. He also used to get ill and often was too ill to fight. He used to heal quick but was more bruises healing in a few days. He was often having to hide injuries from friends aunt mayect. Now he seems to heal very fast. Many others are the same. Wolvy had to get a healing upgrade to compensate. 

Feb 8, 2013 -- 7:09PM, Foxy_Shazam wrote:

Spock, the Star Trek character was in Avenging Spider Man?

Spock = Spider ock or Superior Spiderman or whatever you wanna call him i just like Spock

Spock, the Star Trek character was in Avenging Spider Man?

Actually, you have rejected the idea that Wolverine can die via drowning as Daken did (though to be honest, drowning is one of the few ways that I can think of that makes any sense to kill someone with a healing factor. It’s one of the few ways to make sure that every cell in their body dies).

You also rejected the panel where Spidey pushes Wolverine out of a skyscraper before Wolverine can react.

As well as the scene in the 1982 Spider-Man vs Wolverine where Wolverine says that Spidey can win by pulling his head off.

These scenes coupled with rejecting any place where Spider-Man webs up Wolverine starts to add up.

As for the Spider-Man vs Wolverine side of things, I fully support that Wolverine would likely win a fight to the death because I don’t think that it’s in Spidey’s character to kill him, whereas Wolverine has no real compunctions against it. I also support that Wolverine would win in an enclosed space where Spidey couldn’t move around much. In pretty much every other scenario I give the edge to Spider-Man. Again, this is based on his abilities vs Wolverine’s abilities.

With regards to the berserker rage I mentioned, I didn’t mean it in the sense that Wolverine has no tactical intelligence, I meant it in the sense how ‘berserker’ can his rage be if he can just snap out of it when he wants? When he’s written as blinding rage that doesn’t stop I get it, but when he just seems to stop midstride to suddenly become tactical it really seems to toss away the idea that he’s in a blinding rage to begin with. Sorry if I didn’t clarify my point.

With regards to tactics vs scientific knowledge I agree that they are two different things. However, I also think that both are huge factors. There are tons of science-types that would make fine generals, and in the Marvel Universe, many have made decent leaders. Black Panther does just fine as an example.

As for an opinion of different characters you certainly should have one! It would be crazy if you didn’t. If you figure I haven’t read enough comics to get a handle on Wolverine perhaps you are right, though I am curious, how many do I need to read before I can make an informed decision?  I didn’t bring my opinions into this use as a point of debate (which is what I’m doing, not arguing), I mention them because I figure it’s only fair to state them. Doesn’t mean I being a fan or not a fan counts for much, I’ve been pretty clear about explaining why I think what I think objectively.