Message Boards

You're Viewing:

Anyone whose Spider-Man is 99% mostly 1962-2007??

    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 1,231
    #158 - Posted: September 11, 2012 | 11:34 AM

    Some random thoughts about 1986.


    During the early part of ’86 Secret Wars II was wrapping up, and the Spider-titles had significant tie-ins to this Marvel event.  Unfortunately Secret Wars II as a whole just didn’t work for me, but I did find the Puma arc in the Spider-titles to be more interesting than the mini-series itself.  And I did like the classic vibe of the sweet Leiber/Romita  Sr. cover for ASM 274.


     In Amazing Spider-man the ongoing subplot revolved around the Betty/Flash/Ned triangle and Flash being framed and imprisoned for being the Hobgoblin.  Jean DeWolff’s brother Brian also made an appearance in ASM 278 in a story co-plotted by Peter David.


    In Spectacular Spider-man Peter David brought some significant changes to the life of the Black Cat.  When Spider-man sought out Dr. Strange’s help to rid him of the lingering effects of the black Cat’s ‘bad luck’,  Felicia ended up losing her powers.  Felicia then developed a relationship with the master assassin, Foreigner, and began hatching a plot against Spider-man that she would execute shortly before the big wedding in ’87.


     In August there was a Spider-title crossover of sorts called Missing in Action whose primary purpose was to get rid of the ‘red and blues’ and make the black costume Spider-man’s official costume.


    In Web of Spider-man Spider-man Peter became a traveling international photojournalist  for Jameson’s NOW magazine.  Nothing really spectacular or amazing here, but I kept wondering how a capable journalist like Joy did not realize that Peter was Spider-man.


     Last but not least… Peter and MJ.  During the previous two years there was significant movement and growth for Peter and MJ.  However in ’86 their relationship became more stable.  Throughout 1986 MJ continued to be Peter’s confidant while the spectre of Spider-man continued to be a source of friction in their ongoing relationship.


     In ’84 we had the symbiote costume and MJ’s big reveal.  In ’85 we had the breakup with Felicia and The Death of Jean DeWolff.  But ’86 just didn’t have anything to match the scope of the previous two years… or the Big Wedding that would take place in 1987.


    Almost there… :)

    Stan Lee (August 2009)
    "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known.  And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 1,231
    #157 - Posted: September 5, 2012 | 10:29 PM

    Just wrapped up reading through the 1986 Spider-titles


    Next up 1987 and the wedding of Peter and Mary Jane Parker.  I'll share some additional thoughts on the 1986 Spider-saga later this week.  Until then...


     


    Here's my recommended reading order for 1986


    Web of Spider-man #10-13 – Dominic Fortune & Shocker


    Secret Wars II #7


    Amazing Spider-man #273 – Puma & Beyonder


    Spectacular Spider-man #111 – Puma & Beyonder


    Secret Wars II #8


    Amazing Spider-man #274 – Mephisto, Zarathos & Beyonder


    Secret Wars II #9


    Spectacular Spider-man #112


    Amazing Spider-man #275-276 – Hobgoblin


    Spectacular Spider-man #113-114


    Amazing Spider-man #277 – Daredevil & Kingpin


    Web of Spider-man #14-15 – Black Fox


    Amazing Spider-man #278 – Hobgoblin (Brian DeWolff) (Jul)


    Spectacular Spider-man #115-116 – Dr. Strange, Black Cat, & Sabretooth


    Spectacular Spider-man #120


    Web of Spider-man #16 – Magma (Jul)


    Missing in Action


    -          Web of Spider-man #17 – Magma


    -          Amazing Spider-man #279  – Silver Sable & Jack O’Lantern


    -          Spectacular Spider-man #117 – Black Cat & Foreigner


    -          Web of Spider-man #18


    Spectacular Spider-man #118 – Kingpin & Foreigner


    Amazing Spider-man #280-282 – Silver Sable, Sinister Syndicate, & X-Factor


    Spectacular Spider-man #119 – Black Cat & Sabretooth


    Web of Spider-man #19-22 – ROXXON & Slyde


    Amazing Spider-man #283 – Absorbing Man & Titania


    Web of Spider-man Annual #2 – Warlock (New Mutants)


    Spectacular Spider-man Annual #6


    Amazing Spider-man Annual #20 – Iron Man 2020 (Arno Stark)


    Spectacular Spider-man #121

    Stan Lee (August 2009)
    "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known.  And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 1,231
    #156 - Posted: July 6, 2012 | 11:00 PM

    Here are some thoughts about 1985


    Tom DeFalco began 1985 with a promising story featuring the Hobgoblin, Harry Osborn, and the birth of little Norman.  But for whatever reason after the first two ASM issues of 1985, the Hobgoblin/Harry subplot didn’t progress any further for the remainder of the year.  I believe 1985 also marked the first appearance of Silver Sable in ASM #265 who played a key role in Dan Slott’s recent Ends of the Earth arc.


    From a title perspective, 1985 marked the end of the original Marvel Team-Up series, which was replaced by the new Web of Spider-man title.  Web of Spider-man #1 was a nice Alien Costume story which laid the groundwork for the Venom manifestation of the costume which would appear years later.


    Even though Spider-man only appeared once in issue #2 in 1985 I did include the secret Wars II miniseries in my reading list for a couple of reasons.  First, Secret Wars II #2 did contain a significant crossover to Web #6 and ASM #268.  And second,  the last three issues of Secret Wars II do crossover with the spider-titles in early 1986 beginning with the Prologue in the closing pages of ASM #272.


    The Black Cat/Spider-man relationship officially came to an end in Spectacular-Spider-man #100.  With MJ back in the picture and a relationship where Black Cat didn’t even like Peter Parker it was time to bring the flawed Spider-man/Black Cat relationship to an end.  The Kingpin’s role in the Black Cat/Spider-man breakup was interesting, but I just couldn’t get into The Spot, who also played a significant role in the story leading up to the breakup.


    From a creator perspective, the last half of 1985 could almost be titled “Peter David Cometh”.  Peter David’s first Spider-man story of 1985 was in Spectacular Spider-man #103.  Peter David then continued to write Spectacular Spider-man from August (#105) through the end of the year (#109).  In addition To Spectacular Spider-man Peter David also wrote the following in 1985:  Amazing Spider-man #266-267,  Web of Spider-man #7, and Spectacular Spider-man Annual #5.  Peter David’s greatest Spider-man story, The Death of Jean DeWolff, ran through Spectacular Spider-man #107-110 and regularly appears in top 5 best Spider-man stories of all time lists.


    With the breakup of Spider-man and the Black Cat, the Spider-man writers began to start developing the Peter/MJ relationship again.  Louise Simonson did some nice work on the Peter/MJ relationship in her run on Web of Spider-man #1-3.  And later in the year, Louise foreshadows the marriage two years before it actually happened in this scene from Amazing Spider-man Annual #19.


    Mary Jane is having lunch with her Aunt Anna and Aunt May


    Aunt Anna:  …So you see, Mary Jane, your quarrel with Peter is actually a good sign!


    Aunt May:  Really, Dear!  Within three weeks of my big quarrel with Ben, we were married!


    Aunt Anna:  In fact, May, I think we should give some serious thought about what to wear to their Wedding…!


    So shortly after MJ’s big reveal in 1984 and the Black Cat breakup in early 1985, the Spider-man writers were teasing the Peter/MJ relationship… and foreshadowing the wedding two years before the Peter/MJ wedding took place.

    Stan Lee (August 2009)
    "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known.  And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 1,231
    #155 - Posted: July 6, 2012 | 9:12 PM

    Yea!... I just finished 1985!


    At the rate I’m going it looks like the 25th Anniversary of the Marriage of Peter and MJ will arrive before I make it to Amazing Spider-man Annual #21… But ‘faint heart never won fair maid’… and besides reading the spider-books leading up to the marriage is fun... so onward and forward.


    Here’s my reading order for 1985


     


    Amazing Spider-man #260-261 – Hobgoblin


    Marvel Team-Up #149-15 – X-Men & Juggernaut


    Amazing Spider-man #262


    Spectacular Spider-man #98-99 – Kingpin & The Spot


    Amazing Spider-man #263 – The Spectacular Spider-Kid


    Spectacular Spider-man #100 – Kingpin & The Spot


    Web of Spider-man #1-3 - Alien Costume & Vulture


    Spectacular Spider-man #101 – Backlash


    Amazing Spider-man #264-265 - Black Fox & Silver Sable


    Amazing Spider-man: Hooky


    Spectacular Spider-man #102-103 - Killer Shrike & Human Torch


    Amazing Spider-man #266  – Toad & Frog Man


    Web of Spider-man #4-5 – Dr Octopus


    Spectacular Spider-man #104 – Rocket Racer


    Amazing Spider-man #267 – Human Torch


    Spectacular Spider-man #105-106 - Wasp


    Secret Wars II #1-2 - Beyonder


    Web of Spider-man #6 – Kingpin


    Amazing Spider-man #268 – Kingpin


    Web of Spider-man #7 - Nightmare


    Amazing Spider-man #269-270 – Firelord


    Spectacular Spider-man Annual #5


    Amazing Spider-man Annual #19 – Alistaire Smythe


    Web of Spider-man #8-9


    Web of Spider-man Annual #1


    Amazing Spider-man #271-272 – Crusher Hogan & Slyde


    Spectacular Spider-man #107-110 – Death of Jean DeWolff – Daredevil and Sin-Eater


    Secret Wars II #3-6


     


    I save my comments about 1985 for another post.

    Stan Lee (August 2009)
    "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known.  And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 1,231
    #154 - Posted: July 6, 2012 | 9:11 PM

    Yea!... I just finished 1985!


    At the rate I’m going it looks like the 25th Anniversary of the Marriage of Peter and MJ will arrive before I make it to Amazing Spider-man Annual #21… But ‘faint heart never won fair maid’… and besides reading the spider-books leading up to the marriage is fun... so onward and forward.


     Here’s my reading order for 1985


     


    Amazing Spider-man #260-261 – Hobgoblin


    Marvel Team-Up #149-15 – X-Men & Juggernaut


    Amazing Spider-man #262


    Spectacular Spider-man #98-99 – Kingpin & The Spot


    Amazing Spider-man #263 – The Spectacular Spider-Kid


    Spectacular Spider-man #100 – Kingpin & The Spot


    Web of Spider-man #1-3 - Alien Costume & Vulture


    Spectacular Spider-man #101 – Backlash


    Amazing Spider-man #264-265 - Black Fox & Silver Sable


    Amazing Spider-man: Hooky


    Spectacular Spider-man #102-103 - Killer Shrike & Human Torch


    Amazing Spider-man #266  – Toad & Frog Man


    Web of Spider-man #4-5 – Dr Octopus


    Spectacular Spider-man #104 – Rocket Racer


    Amazing Spider-man #267 – Human Torch


    Spectacular Spider-man #105-106 - Wasp


    Secret Wars II #1-2 - Beyonder


    Web of Spider-man #6 – Kingpin


    Amazing Spider-man #268 – Kingpin


    Web of Spider-man #7 - Nightmare


    Amazing Spider-man #269-270 – Firelord


    Spectacular Spider-man Annual #5


    Amazing Spider-man Annual #19 – Alistaire Smythe


    Web of Spider-man #8-9


    Web of Spider-man Annual #1


    Amazing Spider-man #271-272 – Crusher Hogan & Slyde


    Spectacular Spider-man #107-110 – Death of Jean DeWolff – Daredevil and Sin-Eater


    Secret Wars II #3-6


     


    I save my comments about 1985 for another post.

    Stan Lee (August 2009)
    "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known.  And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 1,231
    #153 - Posted: May 29, 2012 | 12:05 PM

    I think Byrne fans (and haters) should find this interesting...


    CBR just conducted a poll on "The 50 Greatest Spider-man Creators"


    goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2012/0...


    And guess who the #10 Spider-man artist was?  John Byrne


    That was a little unexpected for me since IMHO Spider-man didn't represent John Byrne's best or most significant work.


     


    BTW... They haven't finished the countdown yet, but it looks very likely that Dan Slott will show up somewhere in the top 10 writers.

    Stan Lee (August 2009)
    "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known.  And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
    Joined: April 29 2011
    Posts: 6
    #152 - Posted: May 26, 2012 | 12:54 PM

    We'll just have to disagree on this I think.  I much prefer John Byrne as a writer over the likes of Brian Michael Bendis, Dwayne Mc Duffie, Geoff Johns, Roy Thomas, and Dan Jurgens.  I would put him slightly above Mark Millar, Peter David, both of whom have really high notes but have flaws.  I view Mark Waid as his virtual equal, and Stan Lee was is and always will be his better as far as creativity and originality, but then again was anyone really more creative than Stan who enjoyed great success with many different artists.


     


    As for art John Byrne is without a doubt my favorite comic book artist of all time.  For four color superhero fun he really has no equal.  Good girl art I'd give to Dave Stevens.  I recognise the likes of Jack Cole, Jack Kirby, Neil Adams, Jim Steranko, George Perez, Arthur Adams (arthur being a close second for me)  I just think Byrne's body of work wins out.


     


    I have often heard how terrible John Byrne is on his message board but hears the thing for me.  I dont go there so I never can be bothered by it.  He dosen't to the best of my knowledge Stalk every comic site forum twitter formsping facebook myspace ect... to get in fans faces because they dont like something he does.  He's off in his little corner where you can go to talk to him, or he just dosen't care.

    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 1,980
    #151 - Posted: May 26, 2012 | 12:00 PM

    Byrne was good during the 70's and 80's but his artwork and writing ability went downhill during his Godawful AVENGERS WEST COAST run. He's a has been that refuses to realize that no one cares about him anymore.


    Stan Lee, Brian Michael Bendis, Dwayne Mc Duffie, Geoff Johns, Mark Millar, Roy Thomas, Peter David, Mark Waid, Dan Jurgens, and a few others are better writers then Byrne ever was.


    Jurgens, Jack Kirby, Mike McKone, Todd Nauck, and a few others are better artists then Byrne ever was.

    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 1,231
    #150 - Posted: May 22, 2012 | 2:33 AM

    May 22, 2012 -- 12:27AM, D._Slott wrote:


    If it's so easy, show me a specific post where that editor has done what you're accusing him of-- and I guarantee you I can find a previous post from the "fan" he was responding to that was rude and/or meriting of that editor's retort.




    You are correct that some times the behaviour in question is a response to rudeness.  But there are also times when the behaviour in question is just unjustified rudeness.  That's the problem with painting with a wide brush.   Carpet bombing often takes out innocent civilians as well.


    Here's the problem with the tit for tat mentality.  Fans justify obnoxios behaviour because they are 'responding' to something creators have said or done that they don't like (and I understand that you have been the target of some horrific and unexcusable behaviour by some crazy people).  Then editors/creators at times will respond obnoxiously to fans because of 'rudeness' (sometimes real... somtimes imagined)... And then the cycle continues and feeds upon itself.


    My position is that all sides need to lay off dialogue (and actions) that are personal in nature... period.  I don't think that incendiary language and behaviour is helpful... even in response to other incendiary behaviour.


    So if a person thinks Spider-man Chapter One sucked... fine.  Let's discuss what people think sucked about Spider-man Chapter One.  But I don't think personal incendiary comments towards Byrne himself are helpful even if Chapter One sucked or even if Byrne may have insulted other creators and/or fans on his website somewhere. 

    Stan Lee (August 2009)
    "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known.  And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
    Joined: May 1 2010
    Posts: 128
    #149 - Posted: May 22, 2012 | 12:27 AM

    May 21, 2012 -- 3:17PM, tomek97 wrote:


    And we don't have to look very far to find an editor who repeatedly baits, mocks, and insults fans...



    Nice dig. But a very biased dig IMO.


    It's easy to throw an accusation at that editor when talking generically.


    If it's so easy, show me a specific post where that editor has done what you're accusing him of-- and I guarantee you I can find a previous post from the "fan" he was responding to that was rude and/or meriting of that editor's retort.


    May 21, 2012 -- 3:17PM, tomek97 wrote:

    not to mention harrassing a former Spider-man writer on his own facebook page.



    Again that is a VERY biased accounting of that.  That former Spider-Man writer RUDELY and WITHOUT PROVOCATION took a very unwarranted shot at that editor's book and creative team in a very public forum. That editor showed up to CALL him on his behavior and fire back in kind.


    Just setting the record straight.


    Now please, go back to bumping your passive agressive thread that's ACTUALLY about how you can't stop obsessing about one story from 5 years ago. Because that's the height of sanity. ;-)

    Page 2 of 17  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 17 Next