Message Boards
Anyone whose Spider-Man is 99% mostly 1962-2007??
|
|
#158
-
Posted: September 11, 2012 | 11:34 AM
Some random thoughts about 1986. During the early part of ’86 Secret Wars II was wrapping up, and the Spider-titles had significant tie-ins to this Marvel event. Unfortunately Secret Wars II as a whole just didn’t work for me, but I did find the Puma arc in the Spider-titles to be more interesting than the mini-series itself. And I did like the classic vibe of the sweet Leiber/Romita Sr. cover for ASM 274. In Amazing Spider-man the ongoing subplot revolved around the Betty/Flash/Ned triangle and Flash being framed and imprisoned for being the Hobgoblin. Jean DeWolff’s brother Brian also made an appearance in ASM 278 in a story co-plotted by Peter David. In Spectacular Spider-man Peter David brought some significant changes to the life of the Black Cat. When Spider-man sought out Dr. Strange’s help to rid him of the lingering effects of the black Cat’s ‘bad luck’, Felicia ended up losing her powers. Felicia then developed a relationship with the master assassin, Foreigner, and began hatching a plot against Spider-man that she would execute shortly before the big wedding in ’87. In August there was a Spider-title crossover of sorts called Missing in Action whose primary purpose was to get rid of the ‘red and blues’ and make the black costume Spider-man’s official costume. In Web of Spider-man Spider-man Peter became a traveling international photojournalist for Jameson’s NOW magazine. Nothing really spectacular or amazing here, but I kept wondering how a capable journalist like Joy did not realize that Peter was Spider-man. Last but not least… Peter and MJ. During the previous two years there was significant movement and growth for Peter and MJ. However in ’86 their relationship became more stable. Throughout 1986 MJ continued to be Peter’s confidant while the spectre of Spider-man continued to be a source of friction in their ongoing relationship. In ’84 we had the symbiote costume and MJ’s big reveal. In ’85 we had the breakup with Felicia and The Death of Jean DeWolff. But ’86 just didn’t have anything to match the scope of the previous two years… or the Big Wedding that would take place in 1987. Almost there… :)
Stan Lee (August 2009) "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known. And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
|
|
|
#157
-
Posted: September 5, 2012 | 10:29 PM
Just wrapped up reading through the 1986 Spider-titles Next up 1987 and the wedding of Peter and Mary Jane Parker. I'll share some additional thoughts on the 1986 Spider-saga later this week. Until then... Here's my recommended reading order for 1986 Web of Spider-man #10-13 – Dominic Fortune & Shocker Secret Wars II #7 Amazing Spider-man #273 – Puma & Beyonder Spectacular Spider-man #111 – Puma & Beyonder Secret Wars II #8 Amazing Spider-man #274 – Mephisto, Zarathos & Beyonder Secret Wars II #9 Spectacular Spider-man #112 Amazing Spider-man #275-276 – Hobgoblin Spectacular Spider-man #113-114 Amazing Spider-man #277 – Daredevil & Kingpin Web of Spider-man #14-15 – Black Fox Amazing Spider-man #278 – Hobgoblin (Brian DeWolff) (Jul) Spectacular Spider-man #115-116 – Dr. Strange, Black Cat, & Sabretooth Spectacular Spider-man #120 Web of Spider-man #16 – Magma (Jul) Missing in Action - Web of Spider-man #17 – Magma - Amazing Spider-man #279 – Silver Sable & Jack O’Lantern - Spectacular Spider-man #117 – Black Cat & Foreigner - Web of Spider-man #18 Spectacular Spider-man #118 – Kingpin & Foreigner Amazing Spider-man #280-282 – Silver Sable, Sinister Syndicate, & X-Factor Spectacular Spider-man #119 – Black Cat & Sabretooth Web of Spider-man #19-22 – ROXXON & Slyde Amazing Spider-man #283 – Absorbing Man & Titania Web of Spider-man Annual #2 – Warlock (New Mutants) Spectacular Spider-man Annual #6 Amazing Spider-man Annual #20 – Iron Man 2020 (Arno Stark) Spectacular Spider-man #121
Stan Lee (August 2009) "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known. And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
|
|
|
#156
-
Posted: July 6, 2012 | 11:00 PM
Here are some thoughts about 1985 Tom DeFalco began 1985 with a promising story featuring the Hobgoblin, Harry Osborn, and the birth of little Norman. But for whatever reason after the first two ASM issues of 1985, the Hobgoblin/Harry subplot didn’t progress any further for the remainder of the year. I believe 1985 also marked the first appearance of Silver Sable in ASM #265 who played a key role in Dan Slott’s recent Ends of the Earth arc. From a title perspective, 1985 marked the end of the original Marvel Team-Up series, which was replaced by the new Web of Spider-man title. Web of Spider-man #1 was a nice Alien Costume story which laid the groundwork for the Venom manifestation of the costume which would appear years later. Even though Spider-man only appeared once in issue #2 in 1985 I did include the secret Wars II miniseries in my reading list for a couple of reasons. First, Secret Wars II #2 did contain a significant crossover to Web #6 and ASM #268. And second, the last three issues of Secret Wars II do crossover with the spider-titles in early 1986 beginning with the Prologue in the closing pages of ASM #272. The Black Cat/Spider-man relationship officially came to an end in Spectacular-Spider-man #100. With MJ back in the picture and a relationship where Black Cat didn’t even like Peter Parker it was time to bring the flawed Spider-man/Black Cat relationship to an end. The Kingpin’s role in the Black Cat/Spider-man breakup was interesting, but I just couldn’t get into The Spot, who also played a significant role in the story leading up to the breakup. From a creator perspective, the last half of 1985 could almost be titled “Peter David Cometh”. Peter David’s first Spider-man story of 1985 was in Spectacular Spider-man #103. Peter David then continued to write Spectacular Spider-man from August (#105) through the end of the year (#109). In addition To Spectacular Spider-man Peter David also wrote the following in 1985: Amazing Spider-man #266-267, Web of Spider-man #7, and Spectacular Spider-man Annual #5. Peter David’s greatest Spider-man story, The Death of Jean DeWolff, ran through Spectacular Spider-man #107-110 and regularly appears in top 5 best Spider-man stories of all time lists. With the breakup of Spider-man and the Black Cat, the Spider-man writers began to start developing the Peter/MJ relationship again. Louise Simonson did some nice work on the Peter/MJ relationship in her run on Web of Spider-man #1-3. And later in the year, Louise foreshadows the marriage two years before it actually happened in this scene from Amazing Spider-man Annual #19. Mary Jane is having lunch with her Aunt Anna and Aunt May Aunt Anna: …So you see, Mary Jane, your quarrel with Peter is actually a good sign! Aunt May: Really, Dear! Within three weeks of my big quarrel with Ben, we were married! Aunt Anna: In fact, May, I think we should give some serious thought about what to wear to their Wedding…! So shortly after MJ’s big reveal in 1984 and the Black Cat breakup in early 1985, the Spider-man writers were teasing the Peter/MJ relationship… and foreshadowing the wedding two years before the Peter/MJ wedding took place.
Stan Lee (August 2009) "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known. And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
|
|
|
#155
-
Posted: July 6, 2012 | 9:12 PM
Yea!... I just finished 1985! At the rate I’m going it looks like the 25th Anniversary of the Marriage of Peter and MJ will arrive before I make it to Amazing Spider-man Annual #21… But ‘faint heart never won fair maid’… and besides reading the spider-books leading up to the marriage is fun... so onward and forward. Here’s my reading order for 1985 Amazing Spider-man #260-261 – Hobgoblin Marvel Team-Up #149-15 – X-Men & Juggernaut Amazing Spider-man #262 Spectacular Spider-man #98-99 – Kingpin & The Spot Amazing Spider-man #263 – The Spectacular Spider-Kid Spectacular Spider-man #100 – Kingpin & The Spot Web of Spider-man #1-3 - Alien Costume & Vulture Spectacular Spider-man #101 – Backlash Amazing Spider-man #264-265 - Black Fox & Silver Sable Amazing Spider-man: Hooky Spectacular Spider-man #102-103 - Killer Shrike & Human Torch Amazing Spider-man #266 – Toad & Frog Man Web of Spider-man #4-5 – Dr Octopus Spectacular Spider-man #104 – Rocket Racer Amazing Spider-man #267 – Human Torch Spectacular Spider-man #105-106 - Wasp Secret Wars II #1-2 - Beyonder Web of Spider-man #6 – Kingpin Amazing Spider-man #268 – Kingpin Web of Spider-man #7 - Nightmare Amazing Spider-man #269-270 – Firelord Spectacular Spider-man Annual #5 Amazing Spider-man Annual #19 – Alistaire Smythe Web of Spider-man #8-9 Web of Spider-man Annual #1 Amazing Spider-man #271-272 – Crusher Hogan & Slyde Spectacular Spider-man #107-110 – Death of Jean DeWolff – Daredevil and Sin-Eater Secret Wars II #3-6 I save my comments about 1985 for another post.
Stan Lee (August 2009) "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known. And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
|
|
|
#154
-
Posted: July 6, 2012 | 9:11 PM
Yea!... I just finished 1985! At the rate I’m going it looks like the 25th Anniversary of the Marriage of Peter and MJ will arrive before I make it to Amazing Spider-man Annual #21… But ‘faint heart never won fair maid’… and besides reading the spider-books leading up to the marriage is fun... so onward and forward. Here’s my reading order for 1985 Amazing Spider-man #260-261 – Hobgoblin Marvel Team-Up #149-15 – X-Men & Juggernaut Amazing Spider-man #262 Spectacular Spider-man #98-99 – Kingpin & The Spot Amazing Spider-man #263 – The Spectacular Spider-Kid Spectacular Spider-man #100 – Kingpin & The Spot Web of Spider-man #1-3 - Alien Costume & Vulture Spectacular Spider-man #101 – Backlash Amazing Spider-man #264-265 - Black Fox & Silver Sable Amazing Spider-man: Hooky Spectacular Spider-man #102-103 - Killer Shrike & Human Torch Amazing Spider-man #266 – Toad & Frog Man Web of Spider-man #4-5 – Dr Octopus Spectacular Spider-man #104 – Rocket Racer Amazing Spider-man #267 – Human Torch Spectacular Spider-man #105-106 - Wasp Secret Wars II #1-2 - Beyonder Web of Spider-man #6 – Kingpin Amazing Spider-man #268 – Kingpin Web of Spider-man #7 - Nightmare Amazing Spider-man #269-270 – Firelord Spectacular Spider-man Annual #5 Amazing Spider-man Annual #19 – Alistaire Smythe Web of Spider-man #8-9 Web of Spider-man Annual #1 Amazing Spider-man #271-272 – Crusher Hogan & Slyde Spectacular Spider-man #107-110 – Death of Jean DeWolff – Daredevil and Sin-Eater Secret Wars II #3-6 I save my comments about 1985 for another post.
Stan Lee (August 2009) "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known. And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
|
|
|
#153
-
Posted: May 29, 2012 | 12:05 PM
I think Byrne fans (and haters) should find this interesting... CBR just conducted a poll on "The 50 Greatest Spider-man Creators" goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2012/0... And guess who the #10 Spider-man artist was? John Byrne That was a little unexpected for me since IMHO Spider-man didn't represent John Byrne's best or most significant work. BTW... They haven't finished the countdown yet, but it looks very likely that Dan Slott will show up somewhere in the top 10 writers.
Stan Lee (August 2009) "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known. And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
|
|
|
#152
-
Posted: May 26, 2012 | 12:54 PM
We'll just have to disagree on this I think. I much prefer John Byrne as a writer over the likes of Brian Michael Bendis, Dwayne Mc Duffie, Geoff Johns, Roy Thomas, and Dan Jurgens. I would put him slightly above Mark Millar, Peter David, both of whom have really high notes but have flaws. I view Mark Waid as his virtual equal, and Stan Lee was is and always will be his better as far as creativity and originality, but then again was anyone really more creative than Stan who enjoyed great success with many different artists. As for art John Byrne is without a doubt my favorite comic book artist of all time. For four color superhero fun he really has no equal. Good girl art I'd give to Dave Stevens. I recognise the likes of Jack Cole, Jack Kirby, Neil Adams, Jim Steranko, George Perez, Arthur Adams (arthur being a close second for me) I just think Byrne's body of work wins out. I have often heard how terrible John Byrne is on his message board but hears the thing for me. I dont go there so I never can be bothered by it. He dosen't to the best of my knowledge Stalk every comic site forum twitter formsping facebook myspace ect... to get in fans faces because they dont like something he does. He's off in his little corner where you can go to talk to him, or he just dosen't care.
|
|
|
#151
-
Posted: May 26, 2012 | 12:00 PM
Byrne was good during the 70's and 80's but his artwork and writing ability went downhill during his Godawful AVENGERS WEST COAST run. He's a has been that refuses to realize that no one cares about him anymore. Stan Lee, Brian Michael Bendis, Dwayne Mc Duffie, Geoff Johns, Mark Millar, Roy Thomas, Peter David, Mark Waid, Dan Jurgens, and a few others are better writers then Byrne ever was. Jurgens, Jack Kirby, Mike McKone, Todd Nauck, and a few others are better artists then Byrne ever was.
|
|
|
#150
-
Posted: May 22, 2012 | 2:33 AM
If it's so easy, show me a specific post where that editor has done what you're accusing him of-- and I guarantee you I can find a previous post from the "fan" he was responding to that was rude and/or meriting of that editor's retort.
You are correct that some times the behaviour in question is a response to rudeness. But there are also times when the behaviour in question is just unjustified rudeness. That's the problem with painting with a wide brush. Carpet bombing often takes out innocent civilians as well. Here's the problem with the tit for tat mentality. Fans justify obnoxios behaviour because they are 'responding' to something creators have said or done that they don't like (and I understand that you have been the target of some horrific and unexcusable behaviour by some crazy people). Then editors/creators at times will respond obnoxiously to fans because of 'rudeness' (sometimes real... somtimes imagined)... And then the cycle continues and feeds upon itself. My position is that all sides need to lay off dialogue (and actions) that are personal in nature... period. I don't think that incendiary language and behaviour is helpful... even in response to other incendiary behaviour. So if a person thinks Spider-man Chapter One sucked... fine. Let's discuss what people think sucked about Spider-man Chapter One. But I don't think personal incendiary comments towards Byrne himself are helpful even if Chapter One sucked or even if Byrne may have insulted other creators and/or fans on his website somewhere.
Stan Lee (August 2009) "I agree with you, it wasn't typical of the Spider-Man we have known. And I think they'll get back to the normal Spider-Man and Mary Jane relationship... they will, sooner or later they will, I'm sure of it."
|
|
|
#149
-
Posted: May 22, 2012 | 12:27 AM
And we don't have to look very far to find an editor who repeatedly baits, mocks, and insults fans...
Nice dig. But a very biased dig IMO. It's easy to throw an accusation at that editor when talking generically. If it's so easy, show me a specific post where that editor has done what you're accusing him of-- and I guarantee you I can find a previous post from the "fan" he was responding to that was rude and/or meriting of that editor's retort. not to mention harrassing a former Spider-man writer on his own facebook page.
Again that is a VERY biased accounting of that. That former Spider-Man writer RUDELY and WITHOUT PROVOCATION took a very unwarranted shot at that editor's book and creative team in a very public forum. That editor showed up to CALL him on his behavior and fire back in kind. Just setting the record straight. Now please, go back to bumping your passive agressive thread that's ACTUALLY about how you can't stop obsessing about one story from 5 years ago. Because that's the height of sanity. ;-)
|
|
|